Gun Culture

Thursday, October 28, 2004

The Dictatorship

The following was sent to Steve Black from well known patriot Bob Lomas.  It’s quite a long piece, but a worthwhile read.  In this mini essay you see how we have been betrayed by treasonous politicians and let down by a Monarch who has either been poorly advised or threatened into complicity.  We see how our country has been given away to a foreign power, how our ancient and wonderful legal system has been systematically picked apart in favour of Code Napolean and how the people of the UK have had their rights taken from them.

THE DICTATORSHIP

Under British law we can do virtually anything we wish providing there is no law against it.

In Europe you can only do what the law says you can.

In the United Kingdom the state is the servant of the people.

In Europe the people are subjects of the state.

In the United Kingdom we have inalienable common law rights that the state cannot deny us or take away from us.

In Europe rights are awarded by the state and can be withdrawn at the state’s discretion.

In the United Kingdom the people control the state, for the sovereignty rests with the people.

In Europe the state controls the people for it is the state which is sovereign.

In the United Kingdom we do not have a state police force, we have county police forces accountable to the Crown which represents the people.

In Europe they have state police forces whose job it is to enforce state policy.

The Anglo-Saxon state system of the United Kingdom, backed and upheld by a national constitution that has evolved over a thousand years, is the absolute antithesis of the European system. As an example of this totally opposed way of thinking one only has to look at the first draft of the EU constitution in which it says,” everyone is entitled to compulsory education”. What advancement could possibly be gained for the British people by abandoning a thousand years of common sense development and embracing the doctrines of people that are by comparison in the infancy of democratic development?

There can be absolutely no doubt whatsoever that there never was, is not, nor could there ever be, any advantage or gain to be made for the British people from the United Kingdom being a member of the European Union of the Regions, not strategically, culturally or economically. It is a matter of chalk and cheese, the mixture of which defies the palate of all, and enforced ingestion results in nausea.

So why is the United Kingdom a member of the European Union? A membership that has cost us billions of pounds, destroyed our industries, in particular our steel, coal. farming, fishing and vehicle manufacturing industries. A membership that has caused the premature deaths of hard working farmers and destroyed their families, and made honest traders common criminals for refusing to bend the knee to a foreign political dictatorship. A membership that has destroyed the social structure of our small, and in particular rural, communities by making it impossible for small businesses, local shops and post offices, garages and public houses to survive. And all for no gain or advantage that anyone has been able to realistically or honestly prove.

Are the British people stupid? No they are not. Are they gullible? A little perhaps. So how did it happen? How have the British people been so taken in, duped in fact? It is because they are basically honest and trusting. They trusted their politicians to abide by the law. They trusted the Judiciary to uphold the law, and above all, they trusted the Queen to stand by her Coronation Oath and protect them from despotic Parliaments and foreign incursion. Alas, time has proved their trust misplaced.

In 1972 Parliament connived with a foreign power, the European Community, and treasonously agreed to surrender the supremacy of the peoples law to that foreign power, thus the supremacy of the peoples sovereignty, the Constitution and the Crown were subjugated to an alien foreign power.

All was achieved by covert conspiracy, misrepresentation and deceit, by perjury at the highest level, by dereliction of obligation of office, in particular the Judiciary and senior members of the Armed Forces, and with the tacit consent of the Monarch, who, by sworn obligation, should have prevented all this from happening by using her power of veto according to the checks and balances of our constitutional system, but she declined to do so.

    Nor did the Queen in any of her state opening of Parliament speeches state, mention or imply that it was the intention of her government to surrender the sovereignty of the British people to a foreign power, or make our laws subservient to that foreign power, or make it a criminal offence for Englishmen to use their thousand year old system of weights and measures which the Monarch swore to uphold at the time of her coronation. Had the Queen spoken of these unlawful intentions she would have disclosed to her people her acceptance of being made a mediatised suzerain monarch in her own kingdom, having abdicated her office of supreme Sovereign Head of State and official Governor of the nation. There can be no sovereign head of state in a nation that is not sovereign, and no official governor in a state that has surrendered its supreme power of self governance to another power.

To cover up the duplicity and the magnitude of the offence Parliament, backed and supported by a subjected and politicised Judiciary, has always claimed that its action could easily be reversed simply by repealing the European Communities Act 1972, and the Queen continues to go through the constitutional ceremonies of state as if they still had meaning, a deceitful charade, sham gestures of nationhood, for in truth the termination of the nation state had long ago been agreed on by Parliament when it took it upon itself to make this country a group of regions of the European Superstate. Parliament never had, nor does it have, any intention of repealing the ECA 1972.

The British Parliament is itself a sham, for having surrendered its authority as supreme legislator, and surrendered the absolute authority of the Crown, it no longer has lawful legitimacy, for it was from the Crown it drew its legitimacy. Parliament is now no more than an administration for the EU, and a temporary one at that, for as soon as the regions have their own governments directly accountable to the EU, central governments will be disbanded. Parliament, having in reality discarded the Crown, the Monarch and the Constitution, is part of the EU.

The British people are not part of the EU, for they never agreed to join it, or give up their inalienable right to be an independent people of self political determination. This simple fact makes Parliament, dominated as it is by three political parties working in coalition to suppress the rights and liberties of the people, not only an unlawful assembly but a political dictatorship, for it no longer represents the political aspiration of the people.

And so we see this dictatorship stealthily and erroneously changing the British Anglo-Saxon system of nationhood in which the state is the servant of the people, to the European system where the people are the subjects of the state. Those freedoms that took generations to fight for and win, and which we quite rightly took for granted as our birthright, are being steadily taken from us. More and more rules and regulations are being imposed upon us every day of our lives, a continuous erosion of our rights and freedoms. The words “we are not allowed to do that” ring out constantly from every shop, hospital, office, council, school, club, in fact every facet of society. An Englishman cannot fish in his own stretch of river without a licence, or get a job without some meaningless certificate. Soon we will no longer be allowed to do anything unless the state says we can.

The British people have become a subjected people in a police state and the majority have still to realise it, but little by little they are waking up. It invariably takes a long time for people to realise that they are under the oppression of a dictatorship, and all too often it takes even longer for them to free themselves from its clutches. BLomas

 

THE ABDICATION IN DEED OF THE QUEEN

In 1972 Parliament colluded with a foreign political power and signed a treaty with that power in which Parliament agreed to surrender to it the sovereignty of the nation.

Parliament agreed to the subjugation of our laws, the surrender of our territorial waters, our self autonomy over our agricultural and fishing industries, and through devious measures manipulated the erosion of our fuel and base industries to the advantage of that foreign power.

In order to deceive the people, Parliament heavily disguised the principle of that political foreign power, then spuriously referred to as “The Common Market”, as being no more than a trading block of independent nations. Yet Parliament was aware that the stated principle of that power was to create a fully politically integrated united Europe, ultimately necessitating the total surrender of the sovereignties and self autonomies of the countries involved.

To stave off any challenge from the people, Parliament claimed, and continues to claim, that it has the power to reverse the process at any time, but after thirty years it is clear that Parliament never had, and does not have, any such intention, which is reflected in its readiness to accept a European Constitution, which will override our own Constitution and so complete the surrender of our nationhood to an unaccountable political foreign power in Europe. Since that time in 1972, Parliament has disregarded constitutional constraint, the Coronation Oath, and its oath of allegiance to the Crown and the British people.

Following the Glorious Revolution of 1688 the people drew up a Declaration of Rights, which became the Bill of Rights 1689. Under the constraint of the Bill of Rights the monarch ceased to rule by divine right and became a constitutional monarch, by deed of oath accountable to the people, and the sovereignty of the people was affirmed. By deed of oath Parliament became accountable to the monarch as the physical embodiment of the people’s sovereignty. At the time of the Coronation the monarch takes a solemn oath to “ govern the people according to their laws and customs” and accepts the responsibility of Governor of the nation and representative of the people’s sovereignty. In return the people vested enormous powers in the monarch to protect them from a despotic and dictatorial Parliament.These powers known as the ‘Royal Prerogative’ include the right of the monarch to refuse the Royal Assent to acts of Parliament, and without reference to Parliament dismiss all ministers and civil servants, disband the armed forces and sell off all ships of war and their stores, thus denying Parliament the opportunity to use a punitive force to suppress the people. It is for this reason that Parliament is denied the right to raise a standing Amy, and that the armed forces remain accountable only to the Crown and the people.

As an additional safeguard, Parliament is appointed on a strictly limited basis and duration not exceeding five years. When that time has expired the monarch dissolves Parliament in the name of the people and a new Parliament is mounted which may not be bound by any previous Parliament. The monarch as official ‘Governor’ of the nation then delegates the governance of the nation to a political party of the people’s choice for the duration of that Parliament, and appoints a Prime Minister of the governing party’s choice. All Parliamentarians are obliged to take a solemn oath to uphold the monarch in the Coronation Oath, making them accountable to the Crown and the people, thus ensuring that the responsibility of governance remains with the monarch as representative of the people’s sovereignty.

When Parliament passed the Act of Accession to the Treaty of Rome it placed the Queen in breach of Her Coronation Oath, it suborned the powers of the Queen as Supreme Sovereign Head of State to a foreign power, it surrendered its powers as supreme legislature of the nation, and placed the British people under the will and oppression of a foreign political dictatorship. Parliament assumed the role of agent to that foreign power, politicised the judiciary, and by unlawful and unconstitutional procedure embraced into British law the laws of that foreign power, which has resulted in Englishmen being made criminals for upholding British laws and disregarding the laws of foreign diktat.

The safeguards that our wise forbears built into the Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights, to protect the people from despotic kings and governments and from the take-over of foreign overlords, has failed.

Parliament now claims that it is sovereign, that it has supreme power, and cannot be held accountable for its actions, thus denouncing the fact in law that the sovereignty of the nation rests solely with the people and is represented by the Queen as the physical embodiment of the people’s sovereignty.

If Parliament was sovereign, when the Queen dissolves Parliament the sovereignty would disappear, but the sovereignty remains, for it rests with the Queen and the people.

The judiciary now claims that it has no jurisdiction over Parliament, that the law is now subject to policy, implying that Parliament is above the law, and denouncing the constraints of the Constitution and the Coronation Oath. Even the Church of England, of which the Queen is the Head, has colluded with Parliament in the plan to break up the United Kingdom into regions of the European Union. This is the recipe of a political dictatorship.

There can now be no doubt that treason has and is taking place in Parliament and that collusion, duplicity and deceit occur unchallenged by the judiciary whose responsibility it is to uphold lawful procedure in Parliament.

Under the compact that the Queen entered into with the people at the time of Her Coronation, and the binding obligation of Her Coronation Oath, the responsibility for all that has taken place in Parliament rests with the Queen as the official Governor of the nation. Whether the Queen was misinformed, misguided or coerced by Her ministers into giving Her Royal Assent to unlawful Parliamentary procedures, or whether She approved by tacit consent, it makes no difference, the Queen is in breach of Her Coronation Oath. The Queen has allowed Herself to become a suzerain monarch in Her own kingdom, and by so doing has abdicated Her office as constitutional monarch, in deed if not by statement.

As the Queens personal views on our involvement with the EU has never been officially conveyed to Her people, one can only speculate on the evidence of events. When Englishmen were made criminals in the Queens court for doing no more than abiding by the “laws and customs” the Queen swore to uphold in Her compact with the people, the Queen took no steps to intervene and protect Her subjects from the imposition of foreign rule. And it cannot be overlooked that Her Majesty’s warships are used to impose foreign rule on British fishermen in our own territorial waters.

Over the past thirty years the people have sent hundreds of thousands of letters and petitions to the Queen protesting the unlawful and unconstitutional actions of Her Parliament. There is no evidence to prove that the Queen saw any of these, but the Queen is at the centre of the Constitution and must know it well, and it is known that the Queen reads the newspapers and keeps Herself well informed of current affairs. The evidence suggests therefore that the Queen has no intention of intervening in Parliament’s plans to dismantle the nation state in accordance with the objective of the Treaty of Rome. With a subjected politicised judiciary that denies the people redress through the law, and without a sovereign head of state to champion the people’s sovereignty, the British people are now totally exposed to the dictates of a foreign political power, administered by their own Parliament. The trappings of statehood remain as Parliament feeds the delusion that the Queen still reigns supreme, that Parliament still has control over its own destiny, and so for the time being the feeling of nationhood remains. But in truth Parliament has sold us out, it has overthrown the authority of the Crown, it has disenfranchised the British people, for without our own supreme laws and autonomy we are but nothing as a nation. Over the course of our history there have been monarchs and parliaments that at times were in dereliction of their obligations and distanced themselves from the people, but never without ultimate unpleasant retribution. We can only fear for the generations to come.

Those of us in what might be described as ‘The Resistance’ hear that the Queen has been taking advice from people outside the corrupt and institutionally treasonous inner sanctum of government officialdom and that the cry of the people is at last being heeded.  Perhaps we are deluding ourselves, perhaps it is even too late for the Crown to take back that which has been so cravenly stolen and given away.
I hope not, and I hope that we are all doing that which we can to facilitate the return of our country.